Mike Arnold
Registered
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 351
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 0
Mike,
First I want to say thanks for your thoroughness as I have read this thread and all but one of the questions I've been having are now answered.
A little background before I get into it..
I am now almost 21 years old. When I was 18, after 2 years of consistent weight training, nutrition, and study, I made the decision to try a SDMZ 2.0 stack. I was 175lbs at the time and naturally strong and rather muscular. I blew up and my strength went through the roof, as I grew to a solid/clean 195lbs. After two months of careful and hard work I successfully kept most of my gains and almost all of my strength, ending at 192lbs. Unfortunately, I gave up on all that I had gained and accomplished. After two years of horrible nutrition and an extremely toxic lifestyle, I dropped down to a very malnourished 145lbs.
Now, after two months of a great diet and 7 total weeks of exercise (3 weeks being introductory exercises to get my body/mind back into motion, and these last 4 weeks being consistent weight training), I am back to a very lean 160lbs. I have been seeing results like I am a beginner, and size and strength seem to increase every day. I am seeing 1-2 lbs every 4-5 days, and noticeable size increases. Thank God for muscle memory.
I am back in the fitness industry again and feel shitty about what I've let myself lose, to say the least. I want to be back to that 195 ASAP. Herein lies my question.
Is it better to try to gain as much back as possible before doing a SDMZ cycle, and without the boost? Or will it not effect me other than increasing the rate at which i return to my prime 195?
I know I can do it without a cycle, and I also know it might take a few months. But If I can just get back to 195 faster, why not? I have two viewpoints. One part of me wants to believe because my body has been there at 195lbs, using a cycle to get me back there will only reiterate to my bodies physiology that 195 is where I need to be. The other part says I might actually limit myself and make my bodies potential less if I used a cycle to get up there.
The answer might also apply to those who worry taking such a strong cycle at a young age will halt their bodies potential. I am a believer it only increases your bodies potential as it changes ones physiology. Studies actually show this, as I understand you probably know. (Pointed More towards readers)
Anyways, I appreciate your time and expertise. I look forward to hearing your response, and enjoy learning from your answers.
You know, there really isn't a right or wrong way to do it...and personal opinion will naturally play a role in the conclusion one comes to. I grew up in a day when guys would actually build a solid base of muscle tissue BEFORE adding drugs into the equation. This tended to teach guys invaluable lessons that were often missed when making the jump right to drugs.
As far a quick jump to drugs holding back long-term progress, it was at times proposed to be the case, but in reality, there is no evidence available to support that claim....and the more we learn about these drugs and the overall growth process, the less viable this claim seems.
However, for unrelated reasons, I would personally suggest waiting until you at least get back to 175 lbs. After all, that was your starting bodyweight. There is absolutely no need to use drugs to reach a bodyweight that you carried naturally, as your body can already quickly and easily regain that lost bodymass on its own.
Let me tell you a brief story. When I first began training (serious training) at age 22, I weighed 167 lbs at a height of 6'1. Within 12 weeks I reached 208 lbs with very little increase in bodyfat. At LEAST 30+ lbs of the 41 lbs I gained was lean tissue...at least. My strength increased by a massive margin, such as my bench pressing jumping from 245 for reps to 315 for reps...and deadlifts from 245 for reps to 405 for reps, etc. All my lifts went up similarly. I know many guys who don't even gain anywhere close to that amount during their 1st cycle, let alone naturally over a 12 week period, but it does go to show just what the body is capable of when you are doing everything right.
Few people are following an optimal eating & training program and their overall results suffer because of it. I would suggest learning how to eat & train optimally at this moment in time....because if you do, you could regain all that lost bodyweight back faster than many guys who use drugs. Steroids are limited by nutrition. You could take all the steroids in the world, but you will never be able to build muscle at a maximum rate without supplying the required amount of food.
You didn't mention your height, but if you are 5'10 or above, you should EASILY be able to hit 195 lbs without drugs in a just a couple months. Of course, this would require a hard & basic training program centered almost completely around the core exercises, such as squats, deadlifts, flat & incline presses, overhead presses, barbell and/or t-bar rows, chins, etc. At your level of dvelopment, you will only hold yourself back by doing a bunch of different exercises for each bodypart. Also, screw high volume at this point--you don't need it, nor will it serve you best. Train with low-moderate volume while focusing on progressive resistance in the 6-12 rep range for upper-body and 10-15 for lower body. Train to failure on your work-sets, which should not be many. Eat like a horse every day, sleep well each night, train each muscle once every 5-6 days (you don't need to rest 7 days inbetween workouts at this point, as you are not developed enough to require that much recovery time) and the muscle will come on rapidly.
Then, when you introduce Super DMZ 3.0 (the strongest oral steroid combination available), you will be able to rapidly add a bunch of muscle on top of what you already gained. By summer-time you could easily be sitting at around 215 lbs. Again, this is all dependent on your caloric intake and an effective training program. The training programs that the pros use and not the most effective for beginners-intermediates seeking to build mass. People at your level of development should be putting all their focus on getting stronger on the basic mass-builders in the rep ranges mentioned above. Throwing in a bunch of isolation exercises or using high volume will only hold you back.
Always remember, the bigger you get, the more calories your body will need. Muscle requires calories not only to build, but to maintain. Therefore, the bigger you want to get, the more you must eat...and you must continue eating that new amount of calories forever if you want to keep that muscle. You can never again go back to your old way of eating...or you will lose everything you gained. This is why most guys never get big--because they can't deal with the qauntity of food their body needs to get that big. They struggle to eat enough food just to gain 20-30 lbs, let alone 50 lbs, or 100 lbs. Diet is where the real test lies...and to a lesser degree, training. It's certainly not drugs, as drugs take no effort to use.
Last edited: